Overview
Prompts with Legal Research Questions are designed to produce consistent, structured, and review-ready legal documents that incorporate current legislation, case law and other authorative legal sources.
This approach separates:
Legal research and legal classification, and
Document structure and drafting.
By embedding clearly framed legal research questions directly into the prompt, the system mirrors how lawyers' reason and draft in practice: identifying issues, applying the relevant law, and presenting the output in a clear, structured form.
This design also makes prompts more accurate, easier to maintain, and more resilient to legal change. It avoids reliance on the AI’s underlying training data alone, which may be incomplete or out of date in relation to current law.
What Prompts with Legal Research Questions Does
What Prompts with Legal Research Questions Does
Legal Research Questions are used to identify and apply the current law to the matter and incorporate that analysis into the document.
Legal Research Questions can be used to:
Classify legal issues or legal categories
Identify applicable legislative provisions
Confirm legal tests, thresholds, or legal definitions
Provide concise case summaries
Provide structured legal analysis suitable for drafting
How the Prompt and Legal Research Questions Work Together
How the Prompt and Legal Research Questions Work Together
The workflow is simple:
Legal Research Questions provide current, issue-specific legal analysis
The prompt assembles that analysis into a structured legal document
This allows prompts to support the drafting of documents such as:
Briefs to Counsel
Letters of Advice
Case outlines and mediation position papers
Court submissions and affidavits
How Prompts and Legal Research Questions Works
How Prompts and Legal Research Questions Works
Select the relevant matter
Select the Prompt with Legal Research Questions from the Prompt Library
Review and confirm the Legal Research Questions being asked
Run the prompt
Review the structured output
Use or export the document
Make any required adjustments
Best Practices with Legal Research Questions
Best Practices with Legal Research Questions
1. Use consistent and exact prompt headers
To ensure the system can reliably interpret the prompt and identify Legal Research Questions headers must:
Be in ALL CAPS
Use underscores (_) instead of spaces
End with a colon (:)
The template headings should be as follows:
TITLE:
PURPOSE:
PRELIMINARY_QUESTIONS:
FACT_PAGES:
LEGAL_RESEARCH:
TEMPLATE:
DOCUMENT_RULES:
These headers are used by the system to correctly parse prompt sections and identify which content should be treated as Legal Research Questions.
Important: This is the recommended best practice going forward. Existing prompts will continue to work but may run more slowly over time. For optimal performance, prompts should be formatted using the recommended best practice headers.
2. Drafting Legal Research Questions
Legal Research Questions must appear only in the LEGAL_RESEARCH: section.
Legal_Research:
Question Name | Question |
Question 1 - [Legal Issue] | [Specific legal question] |
Question 1 - [Legal Issue] | [Repeat for other legal questions] |
Legal Research Question Table Example:
Question Name | Question |
Question 1 – Show Cause | Show Cause Do the charges [charge 1] and [repeat for other charges] against the accused fall within the category of offences that require the accused to demonstrate why bail should be granted, based on the type and seriousness of the offences and any relevant prior history? |
Question 2 – Prescribed sexual offence | Do the charges [charge 1] and [repeat for other charges] fall within the category of prescribed sexual offences under New South Wales criminal procedure, based on the nature, seriousness, and legal characterisation of each offence? Use the current legal definition of “prescribed sexual offence” in New South Wales and identify the exact provisions relied upon. |
Question 3 - Interim/Final | AVO Determine whether an interim or final Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) is applicable in relation to each charges [charge 1] and [repeat for other charges], based on whether the offence type or case status triggers the relevant legal considerations and pinpoint exact references. |
When drafting Legal Research Questions:
Focus on one legal issue per question
Be specific and direct
Ask whether something applies and why
Require identification of the legal test, definition, or statutory provision
Where repetition is required, use placeholders such as:
[item 1]
[repeat for other items]
For example, [charge 1] and [repeat for other charges].
This ensures consistent legal treatment across multiple legal issues, charges, or legal claims.
3. Provide Output Template and Output Rules
Use the TEMPLATE: section to specify where each legal research response should appear in the document.
Use the RULES: section to specify any rules as to how you want the output displayed and/or formatted.
Legal research responses are:
Inserted exactly as returned
Not re‑interpreted or re‑analysed by the prompt
Placed into predefined sections of the template
Example Template and Rules:
Template:
Interim/Final AVO
[Provide Output to Question 3 as example in rules]
[Repeat for all other charges]
Rules:
Prescribed sexual offence
For each charge output:
H Number (if applicable)
Offence description
Legislation reference (pinpoint specific section & Act)
Result: Prescribed sexual offence OR Not a prescribed sexual offence
Example output:
H12345678/001 – Sexual assault – S 61I Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – Prescribed
sexual offence
H12345678/002 – Possess prohibited drug – S 10(1) Drug Misuse and
Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – Not a prescribed sexual offence
4. Default Prompts with Legal Questions to either model
Prompts with Legal Questions work with either LPR-CA-V2 or LPR-LA-V2.
Based on testing, LPR-LA-V2 is the recommended default for prompts involving multiple legal questions, complex statutory interpretation, or detailed classification.
5. Understanding the Output
The final output:
Combines document facts and legal research
Follows a fixed structure and layout
Uses neutral, factual language
Provides clear legal classifications (Yes / No / Potential)
Where an answer depends on additional information, this is clearly indicated in the output.
After generating the output:
Review the content for accuracy and completeness
Confirm key details such as names, dates, and identifiers
Adjust wording as required
The AI output is designed to be ready for legal review, not to replace professional judgment.